By Melissa Smith (not really, but she’s probably rolling her eyes) 

Let’s say I take my dogs out for a little “training run” on I‑90. I unclip their leashes, give them a pat, and let them chase semis for sport. It’s tradition, after all. 

They get flattened. 

I mourn briefly, then head to the Department of Transportation with my receipts. “Two dogs down,” I say. “One’s still limping. That’ll be $2,500 each, plus vet bills.”  The DOT nods solemnly. “Tragic,” they say. “Here’s your check.”  please be careful on i-90 we’ve made it a caution zone.
I take the money, swing by a puppy mill I’ve been blocking legislation on for years, and buy a fresh batch of underage, undertrained pups. I run them into traffic next week after I train them on private roads. Trespassing? Whatever.

Repeat. 

No clawbacks. No fines. No questions. Just taxpayer-funded grief and a growing pile of checks. 
Sound absurd? It should. But swap out “I‑90” for “wolf territory,” and “DOT” for “DNR,” and you’ve got Wisconsin’s hound depredation program in a nutshell. 

Hunters run old, arthritic dogs into known wolf zones. They brag online about “culling the junk pack for cash.” Some have assaulted wardens. Some violate harassment laws. And still — they get paid. 

Meanwhile, small family farms collapse under tariffs, bankruptcies, and climate disasters. Their compensation? Zero. 

So maybe it’s time we ask: 
– Why are we funding a blood sport pipeline instead of coexistence? 
– Why do reckless repeat offenders get $2,000 per dog while farmers get nothing for losing their land? 
– Why does the DNR call it “tragic” instead of what it is: a racket?

Do the hound hunters have to open up their land like the farmers do to hunting no because they’re on our public lands on our national and State Forest

Because if this were happening on I‑90, we’d call it criminal negligence, animal cruelty, dog fighting. In fact if it was pitbulls SWAT would be kicking your door in. 

But in wolf country, it’s just another day in Wisconsin wildlife management.  I guess you know the state of Wisconsin doesn’t mind that we pay for dog fighting….

While hound hunters collect checks, Wisconsin’s small family farms are collapsing under the weight of tariffs, bankruptcies, and climate disasters. In 2024 alone, more than 300 farms closed. Weather disasters cause 50–100 times more losses than all wildlife combined.

Wolves are low down on agriculture costs.

And yet, wolves are blamed.

Hound hunters also use the same dogs that are killed by wolves and they wanted to use them for training year-round now it’s been stripped down to just training during wolf hunting season. These are the same dogs they used to hunt wolves, the same ones we’re paying for. In these hound-wolf conflicts, wolves also lose their lives; as many as 14 wolves died during conflicts in 2024  wildlife services of the 25 wolf conflicts, but we don’t hear about that. Perhaps they should be compensating us for poaching. Hound hunters fought the puppy mill bill (Act 90 in 2009, regulating dog breeders and sellers) and opposed roadkill-related legislation, resisting any restrictions on their breeding practices or use of animal remains that could limit their operations. You’re not supposed to receive compensation after 2011/2012 under the original intent of Act 169, which was meant to phase out or limit the program once wolf hunting was mandated—but lobbyists ensured hunters would still be compensated while destroying wolves to “build tolerance,” turning it into ongoing fraud

User Discretion Advised

This compensation racket is exploding out of control, lining the pockets of a vocal minority at your expense: In 2023, payouts for hounds killed by wolves doubled to $2,500 per dog—a windfall for hunters who treat their packs like disposable assets. No clawbacks or accountability, even when necropsies reveal the hounds were old, arthritic, or had worn teeth—dogs unfit for the wild, deliberately sent into danger. Hunters brazenly admit online: they “phase out the junk pack for cash” and use your money to buy fresh pups, turning tragedy into a business model. The Wisconsin DNR labels these deaths “tragic,” but refuses to call it what it is: outright fraud. Where’s the outrage?

In 2015 an investigative report was written about this fraud including also an article in National geographic magazine and even the Wisconsin State journal took a position saying that this practice needed to end.

This isn’t isolated—it’s systemic abuse that mocks justice and drains public funds: At least five documented cases where hunters engaged in illegal wolf harassment yet still pocketed full payouts—no questions asked. In a shocking 2013 Sawyer County case, a hunter who assaulted a warden still collected $5,000 per 2 hound—rewarding violence with your tax dollars. DNR audits reveal the ugly truth: old, arthritic hounds are intentionally run into wolf zones, killed, and cashed in as profit. Hunters openly brag about “culling the herd for profit”—a cycle of cruelty funded by us all. In 2017, Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER) blew the lid off with a complaint exposing a pattern of repeat offenders: hounders illegally harassing wolves during protected periods, getting dogs killed, and raking in payouts—often the same violators, over and over, with zero consequences. Poacher compensation runs rampant: The program hands out cash to known lawbreakers, including those with poaching violations or harassment records, without denying claims based on their criminal history. It’s a free pass for the guilty.

Hunter welfare? – Isthmus | Madison, Wisconsin https://share.google/V1SJsJPl4xMUfahgU

The Wisconsin State Journal published a strong editorial opinion on September 9, 2016, titled “Stop payouts to bear hunters for dead dogs”. In it, the newspaper’s editorial board called for the Wisconsin Legislature to end taxpayer-funded compensation for hunting hounds killed by wolves, arguing that the program rewards irresponsible behavior and wasteful spending.

Key Points from the Editorial:
Wisconsin is the only state that pays hunters up to $2,500 per dog killed by wolves—even when hunters violate rules or release hounds in DNR-mapped high-risk “caution areas”.
The state shouldn’t reimburse hunters who disregard warnings and put their dogs in harm’s way.

Personal responsibility: Hunters choose to run hounds in wolf territory; they shouldn’t get a bailout for avoidable risks.
Broader context: Many states ban bear hounding entirely. Wisconsin allows it, leading to dozens of hound deaths yearly (41 in 2016 alone, costing $99,400).

Direct quote: “The state shouldn’t pay hunters who lose hounds to wolves after disregarding rules and the DNR’s advice. The Legislature should stop the offensive payouts to a minority of bear hunters who don’t deserve compensation for risky behavior.” (Wisconsin State Journal)
This piece sparked backlash from hound hunters (e.g., a rebuttal letter from the Wisconsin Bear Hunters Association) but aligned with growing calls to phase out the program—echoing the reforms in your infographic. Pair it with the marble jar visual for a killer social media post: “WSJ in 2016: End the hound payout scam. 9 years later—still no change!”

Are we done pretending that this is a sport or this is Heritage or tradition or conservation? It doesn’t really matter if Wildlife managers say how many of a quota or how many of this if they’re not going to acknowledge what really happens on the ground and they’re not going to acknowledge that there’s embedded and indebted to the Wisconsin bear hunters association and other deplorable groups such as Hunter Nation Wisconsin Wildlife federation Safari club international and United sportsman’s Alliance this is what they push

Call to action: Lawmakers must stop the offensive payouts to a minority of bear hunters who don’t deserve compensation.

http://www.wiwolvesandwildlife.org/donate

Let’s push this story out everywhere we can into social media using the following graphics. Tweet these to your lawmakers in Wisconsin and beyond. Enough with the dead dogs enough with the Dead bears enough with the dead wolves. .
– Caption: “Every payout fuels more cruelty. End hounding compensation
– Caption: “This isn’t heritage. It’s legalized dog fighting.
– Caption: “Wildlife suffers. Dogs suffer. Taxpayers suffer. Only cruelty wins
– Caption: “Compensation without accountability is corruption

I can generate each of these as bold, ready-to-share graphics in the same style as the first one you saw. Do you want me to create them all in one consistent visual theme (same fonts, colors, textures for a campaign look), or would you like each to have its own distinct style so they stand out individually?

They call it tradition. We call it torment. Hounds unleashed, not for food, not for survival—but for sport. Each chase ends in blood. Each loss becomes profit. And the system? It pays out—no questions asked While kids learn about ecosystems, adults exploit them. While wolves fight to survive, the system rewards their destruction.

This isn’t just about wolves. It’s about all of us. Because when justice is silenced, and cruelty ignored and encouraged no one’s truly safe.

Every dollar fuels reform. Together, we will prevail 
Contribute today — protect wolves, protect integrity.
Grassroots power ends cruelty. Join us. 

We Will Prevail — Contribute Here http://www.wiwolvesandwildlife.org/donate

See you this Wednesday at 6pm to talk about hound hunting

GLWA